From the Salt Lake Tribune:
In 2006 and 2007, then-Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. led an effort to cut the state’s sales tax rate on food from 4.75 percent to 1.75 percent.There's going to be a rally against the bill today at noon at the Capitol Building if anyone is interested. Where is the Tea Party when real taxes are being raised instead of imaginary ones?
But SB270, sponsored by Sen. Stuart Adams, R-Layton, would set the state tax rate at 4.35 on all goods, more than doubling the sales tax on food and cutting the rate on other goods.
The overall impact would be a slight reduction in total sales tax collected. Adams argues that when the economy soured, sales tax receipts dropped sharply because households ratcheted down their spending.
Restoring the sales tax on food would stabilize that revenue stream, Adams says, because people have to buy food.
“We’re running our state on sales tax only, so it’s a very volatile tax and we made it more volatile by taking the food out of the base,” Adams said. “This may not be politically correct … but it is financially correct. It is the right thing for the state of Utah and the right thing for our future.”
...Senate Minority Leader Ross Romero, D-Salt Lake City, said that lowering the general sales tax wouldn’t change the fact that everyone will pay more at the grocery store.
“This is a tax increase on everybody because it’s a tax on food,” he said. “If you are eating food and buying food, you are paying for it and it is an increase.”
House Majority Leader Brad Dee, R-Ogden, said the House has had only a brief discussion about the sales tax on food during its caucus meeting. “I don’t see a lot of love for it,” Dee said.
Back in the Senate, Adams argued claims that the tax change would hit poor people harder are “flat-out unfounded.”
According to a report by the Tax Review Commission, that may be true from a pure dollar standpoint. A family of four that makes less than $20,000 per year would pay an additional $240 in tax, while a family that makes between $50,000 and $70,000 would pay $310.
But because low-income Utahns spend a greater percentage of their total income on food, an increase in tax hits them proportionately harder, the commission said. The family making less than $20,000 spends 15 percent of its income on food, while the figure is just over 5 percent for the higher-income family.
“Low-income people spend the majority of their paycheck, after rent and utilities, on food,” said Linda Hilton, a low-income advocate with the Coalition of Religious Communities. “They are not buying $3,000 dining room sets. They aren’t buying a bunch of jewelry. So lowering the tax rate on those items is a tax break for the rich.”
The commission said that lowering the sales tax on food was an inefficient way to help low-income families and there were more targeted approaches that would be more effective. Several other proposals would seek to help the poor absorb the sales tax increase by giving low-income taxpayers a tax credit to offset the additional cost.